4.3 Article

An Evaluation of Texture-Modified Diets Compliant with the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative in Aged-Care Facilities Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

期刊

DYSPHAGIA
卷 37, 期 5, 页码 1314-1325

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00455-021-10393-2

关键词

IDDSI; Texture-modified diets; Aged care; CFIR; Implementation; Malnutrition; Food service

资金

  1. University of Auckland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Texture-modified diets (TMDs) are commonly prescribed to improve swallowing safety for older adults with swallowing difficulties. The International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI) provides a framework for TMDs. This study used the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) to identify the barriers and enablers to IDDSI adoption in aged-care facilities (ACFs). The findings showed that while ACF managers were aware of IDDSI and had access to online resources, staff awareness and training were lacking. Collaboration and improved communication were important for successful implementation of IDDSI.
Texture-modified diets (TMDs) are commonly prescribed for older adults with swallowing difficulties to improve swallowing safety. The International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI) provides a framework for terminology, definitions and testing of TMDs. This observational mixed-method study used the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) to establish the barriers and enablers to IDDSI adoption in aged-care facilities (ACFs). Five New Zealand ACFs who had adopted IDDSI > 12 months previously were recruited. Evaluation tools were developed based on CFIR constructs, integrating data from (i) mealtime observations; (ii) manager interviews and (iii) staff (nursing, carers and kitchen) self-administrated surveys. All facility and kitchen managers were IDDSI aware and had access to online resources. Three sites had changed to commercially compliant products post-IDDSI adoption, which had cost implications. Awareness of IDDSI amongst staff ranged from 5 to 79% and < 50% of staff surveyed felt sufficiently trained. Awareness was greater in large sites and where IDDSI was mandated by head office. Managers had not mandated auditing and they felt this had led to reduced perceived importance. Managers felt staff required more training and staff wanted more training, believing it would improve food safety and quality of care. Lack of a dedicated project leader and no speech pathologist on-site were perceived barriers. Collaboration between healthcare assistants, kitchen staff and allied health assisted implementation. ACF staff were aware of IDDSI but staff awareness was low. Using the CFIR, site specific and generic barriers and enablers were identified to improve future implementation effectiveness. Managers and staff want access to regular training. Multidisciplinary collaboration and improving communication are essential. ACFs should consider TMD auditing regularly. Successful implementation of IDDSI allows improvement of quality of care and patient safety but requires a systematic, site-specific implementation plan.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据