4.2 Article

In vitro study of the toxic and teratogenic effects of prednisolone, azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetile on embryological development of rats

期刊

DRUG AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY
卷 45, 期 6, 页码 2739-2747

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01480545.2021.1985926

关键词

Azathioprine; mycophenolate mofetile; prednisolone; TUNEL assay; whole embryo culture

资金

  1. Scientific Research Project Commission of Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey [10401118]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study revealed that prednisolone does not have developmental toxicity on rat embryos with a maximum safe dose of 20 μg/ml, while azathioprine showed toxicity and teratogenic effects starting at 1 μg/ml. Mycophenolate mofetile exhibited dose-dependent toxic and teratogenic effects at doses lower than normal clinical ones.
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the glucocorticoid prednisolone, the mycophenolic acid prodrug, azathioprine, and the fungi fermentation end product, mycophenolate mofetile on the embryological development of rats. Nine day-old rat embryos were cultured in rat serum containing prednisolone at varying concentrations (5-30 mu g/ml) for 48 h. The test groups were cultured separately in rat serum containing 0.3-10 mu g/ml azathioprine and 1-10 mu g/ml mycophenolate mofetile. Embryonic development parameter effects of both drugs in combination with prednisolone (20 mu g/ml) were studied using morphological methods, with special attention given to the incidence of malformations. The genotoxic effects of agents evaluated with the TUNEL test revealed that prednisolone is not a cause of developmental toxicity. The maximum safe dose of prednisolone that could be used in combination with other immunosuppressive agents was determined to be 20 mu g/ml. Azathioprine was found to be toxic and teratogenic for the rat embryos beginning at a dose of 1 mu g/ml. Dose-dependent toxic and teratogenic effects of mycophenolate mofetile were detected at doses lower than normal clinical ones.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据