4.2 Article

Transneuronal Degeneration in the Visual Pathway of Rats following Acute Retinal Ischemia/Reperfusion

期刊

DISEASE MARKERS
卷 2021, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2021/2629150

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. National Natural Youth Science Foundation of China [81900890]
  3. Natural Youth Science Foundation of Hunan Province [2021JJ40991]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Fund Project [2018M643004]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province [2021JJ70147]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study established a rat model of acute retinal ischemia/reperfusion to observe morphological changes in neurons and synapses in the visual pathways post-injury, revealing transneuronal degeneration as a key factor in the progressive deterioration of visual function following injury removal.
The maintenance of visual function not only requires the normal structure and function of neurons but also depends on the effective signal propagation of synapses in visual pathways. Synapses emerge alterations of plasticity in the early stages of neuronal damage and affect signal transmission, which leads to transneuronal degeneration. In the present study, rat model of acute retinal ischemia/reperfusion (RI/R) was established to observe the morphological changes of neuronal soma and synapses in the inner plexiform layer (IPL), outer plexiform layer (OPL), and dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN) after retinal injury. We found transneuronal degeneration in the visual pathways following RI/R concretely presented as edema and mitochondrial hyperplasia of neuronal soma in retina, demyelination, and heterotypic protein clusters of axons in LGN. Meanwhile, small immature synapses formed, and there are asynchronous changes between pre- and postsynaptic components in synapses. This evidence demonstrated that transneuronal degeneration exists in RI/R injury, which may be one of the key reasons for the progressive deterioration of visual function after the injury is removed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据