4.6 Article

Graphene quantum dots assisted synthesis of highconcentration nitrogen doped graphene for infrared photodetectors

期刊

DIAMOND AND RELATED MATERIALS
卷 121, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.diamond.2021.108774

关键词

Graphene quantum dots; N-doped graphene; Chemical vapor deposition; Photodetector

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11704204, 61604084, 51802337]
  2. State Key Laboratory of ASIC System [2020KF007]
  3. K. C. Wong Magna Fund in Ningbo University
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Ningbo [2017A610104]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study successfully obtained nitrogen-doped graphene monolayers by seeding nitrogen-doped graphene quantum dots (N-GQDs) on a catalytic substrate, and fabricated high-performance infrared photodetectors.
The application of graphene in the field of microelectronics is becoming more and more urgent with the emergence of bottlenecks in silicon-based semiconductor technology, and the ability of controllable doping in graphene is, therefore, strongly demanded to tune their electronic or optoelectronic properties for the fabrication of high-performance devices. Herein, through seeding zero-dimensional (0D) nitrogen doped graphene quantum dots (N-GQDs) on a catalytic substrate, the graphene monolayer with nitrogen doping is obtained via chemical vapor deposition (CVD). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) characterization shows the doping concentration reaches up to 32%. Experimental and theoretical investigations reveal that N-GQDs act as the nucleation sites for the epitaxial growth of doped graphene monolayers. Finally, infrared photodetector built on N doped graphene (NG) film is fabricated, accompanying with high detectivity (similar to 1.52 x 10(10) cm Hz(1/2) W-1) and responsivity (79 mA W-1) at the wavelength of 1550 nm. Our study may provide a controllable and convenient approach to achieve doped graphene, which paves the way for the application of graphene in the field of microelectronics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据