4.5 Article

Effect of Heat-treatment and Sample Preparation on Physical Properties of XLPE DC Cable Insulation Material

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TDEI.2016.7736807

关键词

HVDC insulation; power cables insulation; cross linked polyethylene insulation; conductivity; dielectric losses; space charge; sample preparation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Power cables with extruded crosslinked polyethylene (XLPE) insulation are used in HVAC and HVDC applications. These cables usually go through a degassing process to remove the methane formed in XLPE during the cross-linking reactions. In case of HVDC cables, the general belief is that the polar peroxide decomposition products (PDP) content significantly influences the conduction and space charge behavior of XLPE. This belief is mainly based on the results of experiments made on thin XLPE samples with different heat-treatments; but since heat-treatment also influences the morphology of the polymer, it is necessary to consider this effect as well. It is common to use polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film as a protective layer during sample press molding. Studies on the influence of the pressing film on the electrical properties of the sample are rare. In this work, the results of a series of experiments performed on 0.5 mm thick XLPE plaque samples in reference to additive free LDPE samples with different heat-treatment times are presented. Beside the PDP content, the morphology, DC conductivity and polarization properties are studied and analyzed. It was found that the pressing film used during sample preparation has a significant effect on the results and if not corrected, it may lead to wrong conclusions about the influence of the PDP content. Eliminating the effect of the pressing film, no clear correlation between the DC conductivity, dielectric loss and the PDP content was observed. The relation between the PDP content and DC conductivity is not found to be obvious, hence this correlation may need to be further evaluated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据