4.4 Article

Revitalizing mouse diphyodontic dentition formation by inhibiting the sonic hedgehog signaling pathway

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL DYNAMICS
卷 251, 期 5, 页码 759-776

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.436

关键词

mouse molar; RSDL; Shh signal; tooth regeneration; Wnt/beta-catenin

资金

  1. Open Subject Project of Fujian Provincial Oral Biomaterial Engineering Technology Research Center/Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology [2019kq07]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province, China [2019J02011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study showed that the Shh signaling pathway inhibitor effectively inhibited the expression of Shh signaling pathway components and promoted cell proliferation to revitalize the rudimentary successional dental lamina. Additionally, the formation of diphyodontic dentition may be related to up-regulation of FGF signal and the Sostdc1-Wnt negative feedback loop.
Background: Tooth regeneration depends on the longevity of the dental epithelial lamina. However, the exact mechanism of dental lamina regression has not yet been clarified. To explore the role of the Sonic hedgehog (Shh) signaling pathway in regression process of the rudimentary successional dental lamina (RSDL) in mice, we orally administered a single dose of a Shh signaling pathway inhibitor to pregnant mice between embryonic day 13.0 (E13.0) and E17.0. Results: We observed that the Shh signaling pathway inhibitor effectively inhibited the expression of Shh signaling pathway components and revitalized RSDL during E15.0-E17.0 by promoting cell proliferation. In addition, mRNA-seq, reverse transcription plus polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), and immunohistochemical analyses indicated that diphyodontic dentition formation might be related to FGF signal up-regulation and the Sostdc1-Wnt negative feedback loop. Conclusions: Overall, our results indicated that the Shh signaling pathway may play an initial role in preventing further development of mouse RSDL in a time-dependent manner.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据