4.7 Article

Potentialities of thermal responsive polymer in forward osmosis (FO) process for water desalination

期刊

DESALINATION
卷 519, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2021.115311

关键词

Forward osmosis; Thermal responsive polymer; Membrane design

资金

  1. Progetti srl of Eng. Stefano Manfredi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared the Forward Osmosis (FO) processes using different draw solutions, AB and PAGBs, in terms of recovery ratio, temperature, and energy requirements. The results showed that PAGBs have lower energy consumption and higher energy efficiency but lower recovery rates, while AB has higher energy consumption and lower efficiency.
This work aims at assessing the technical feasibility and performances of the Forward Osmosis (FO), an emergent desalination process. Two FO processes with different draw solutions have been studied: the first one is based on Ammonium Bicarbonate (AB) and the second on poly (propylene glycol-ran-ethylene glycol) monobutyl ethers (PAGBs) with different molecular weight. The two solutes have different regeneration steps, but they adopt the same membrane separation process of the salt water. The comparison between the different processes is given in terms of recovery ratio, temperature and energy requirements. AB could be regenerated through column distillation at 99.63 degrees C and zeolite filter, while PAGBs could be regenerated at lower temperatures (77.2 - 83.6 degrees C) through gravity separation followed by a final step of nanofiltration. This study showed that PAGBs have great potential to desalinate water in an energy-efficient way, reaching minimum consumptions of 39.5 kWhth/ m3 and 0.5 kWhel/m3, even if the water recovery is not so high ( 24%). On the contrary, AB has shown higher energy consumptions ( 3.51 kWhel/m3, > 442 kWhth/m3). Finally, a comparison based on energy consumptions and recovery ratio with the mature desalination technologies is provided, showing the potentialities of the process when low temperature heat is available.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据