4.5 Article

Linkages between sediment thickness, geomorphology and Mn nodule occurrence: New evidence from AUV geophysical mapping in the Clarion-Clipperton Zone

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr.2021.103645

关键词

Deep sea; Mn nodules; Sub-bottom profiler; AUV imagery; Clarion-clipperton zone

资金

  1. European Union [603418]
  2. UK Natural Environment Research Council, National Capability Programme
  3. Marine Environmental Mapping Programme (MAREMAP)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By utilizing geophysical observations from autonomous underwater vehicles, this study found that higher nodule occurrence is related to layers with increased sediment thickness, suggesting the importance of local seafloor heterogeneity in nodule formation.
The relationship between polymetallic nodules (Mn nodules) and deep-sea stratigraphy is relatively poorly studied and the role of sediment thickness in determining nodule occurrence is an active field of research. This study utilizes geophysical observations from three types of autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) data (multibeam bathymetry, sub-bottom profiles and underwater photography) in order to assess this relationship. Multibeam bathymetry was processed with a pattern recognition approach for producing objective geomorphometric classes of the seafloor for examining their relation to sediment thickness and nodule occurrence. Sub-bottom profiles were used for extracting sediment thickness along a dense network of tracklines. Close-range AUVphotography data was used for automated counting of polymetallic nodules and their geometric features and it served as ground truth data. It was observed that higher nodule occurrence were related to layers with increased sediment thickness. This evidence reveals the role of local seafloor heterogeneity in nodule formation and suggests that unique patterns of local stratigraphy may affect geochemical processes that promote polymetallic nodule development at local scales.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据