4.7 Article

Battery-type hollow Prussian blue analogues for asymmetric supercapacitors

期刊

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
卷 51, 期 3, 页码 1032-1040

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1dt03346h

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51702369, 51873233]
  2. Key R&D Plan of Hubei Province [2020BAB077]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [CZZ21009, CZP20006]
  4. innovation group of the National Ethnic Affairs Commission of China [MZR20006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates a method to fabricate hollow/porous nanostructures using nanoscale Kirkendall effect and showcases the application of CuO/Co3O4 and Fe2O3 nanoframes in supercapacitor electrodes, showing good performance and reliability.
Hollow/porous nanomaterials are widely applicable in various fields. The last few years have witnessed increasing interest in the nanoscale Kirkendall effect as a versatile route to fabricate hollow/porous nanostructures. The transformation of Cu-Co Prussian blue analogue (CuCo-PBA) and FeFe-PBA nanocubes into CuO/Co3O4 and Fe2O3 nanoframes is based on two types of nanoscale Kirkendall effect, which are related to solid-solid interfacial oxidation and solid-gas interfacial reaction, respectively. Both CuO/Co3O4 and Fe2O3 nanoframe electrodes exhibit high reversible discharge capacity, good rate performance and long cycling stability. Moreover, an asymmetric supercapacitor (ASC) is assembled by using CuO/Co3O4 as a cathode and Fe2O3 as an anode, respectively. The ASC can be operated in a wide potential range of 1.4 V with a large specific capacity of 181.8 F g(-1), a high energy density of 48.77 W h kg(-1) (at 751.2 W kg(-1)), an outstanding power density of 3657.8 W kg(-1) (at 32.9 W h kg(-1)) and a good capacity retention (73.68%) after 6000 galvanostatic charge-discharge cycles, together with excellent flexibility. The ASC in series can power a LED and work stably under water conditions, delivering excellent practicability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据