4.5 Review

Neuromodulation Treatments for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Post-concussive Symptoms

期刊

CURRENT NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE REPORTS
卷 22, 期 3, 页码 171-181

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11910-022-01183-w

关键词

Concussion; Mild traumatic brain injury; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Transcranial direct current stimulation; Neuromodulation

资金

  1. Liu Fu Yu Charity Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article reviews recent research on neuromodulation for mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). It suggests that transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) shows promise as a potential treatment strategy for post-concussive symptoms, such as depression and headaches, while transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has more mixed results. Further studies are needed to explore new stimulation protocols, personalized approaches, and the role of placebo effects.
Purpose of Review Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) can result in prolonged post-concussive symptoms (e.g., depression, headaches, cognitive impairment) that are debilitating and difficult to treat. This article reviews recent research on neuromodulation for mTBI. Recent Findings Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is the most studied neuromodulation approach for mTBI (four studies for depression, four for headache, one for cognitive impairment, and two for global post-concussive symptoms) with promising results for post-concussive depression and headache. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has also been evaluated (one study for post-traumatic headache, and three for cognitive impairment), with more mixed results overall. TMS appears to be a potentially promising neuromodulation treatment strategy for post-concussive symptoms; however, integration into clinical practice will require larger sham-controlled randomized trials with longer and more consistent follow-up periods. Future studies should also explore new stimulation protocols, personalized approaches, and the role of placebo effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据