4.3 Review

Artificial intelligence in clinical and translational science: Successes, challenges and opportunities

期刊

CTS-CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE
卷 15, 期 2, 页码 309-321

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cts.13175

关键词

artificial intelligence; machine learning; translational medical research

资金

  1. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) Synergy paper program through the Center for Leading Innovation and Collaboration (CLIC), NCATS [UL1 TR000371, UL1 TR001857, UL1 TR002645]
  2. Office of the Director, NIH [U01 TR002393]
  3. National Library of Medicine [R01 LM011829, K99 LM013383]
  4. National Institute of Aging [P30 AG044271]
  5. PCORI [CDRN-1306-04608]
  6. Reynolds and Reynolds Professorship in Clinical Informatics
  7. Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT) Data Science and Informatics Core for Cancer Research [RP170668]
  8. NCATS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper examines the role of artificial intelligence in clinical and translational research, focusing on challenges, successes, failures, and opportunities. Analysis shows that the most common research topics in AI projects are nervous system and mental disorders, with supervised machine learning and deep learning being the most common computational approaches.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming many domains, including finance, agriculture, defense, and biomedicine. In this paper, we focus on the role of AI in clinical and translational research (CTR), including preclinical research (T1), clinical research (T2), clinical implementation (T3), and public (or population) health (T4). Given the rapid evolution of AI in CTR, we present three complementary perspectives: (1) scoping literature review, (2) survey, and (3) analysis of federally funded projects. For each CTR phase, we addressed challenges, successes, failures, and opportunities for AI. We surveyed Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) hubs regarding AI projects at their institutions. Nineteen of 63 CTSA hubs (30%) responded to the survey. The most common funding source (48.5%) was the federal government. The most common translational phase was T2 (clinical research, 40.2%). Clinicians were the intended users in 44.6% of projects and researchers in 32.3% of projects. The most common computational approaches were supervised machine learning (38.6%) and deep learning (34.2%). The number of projects steadily increased from 2012 to 2020. Finally, we analyzed 2604 AI projects at CTSA hubs using the National Institutes of Health Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools (RePORTER) database for 2011-2019. We mapped available abstracts to medical subject headings and found that nervous system (16.3%) and mental disorders (16.2) were the most common topics addressed. From a computational perspective, big data (32.3%) and deep learning (30.0%) were most common. This work represents a snapshot in time of the role of AI in the CTSA program.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据