4.7 Article

Evaluation of Halogenopyridinium Cations as Halogen Bond Donors

期刊

CRYSTAL GROWTH & DESIGN
卷 21, 期 12, 页码 6889-6901

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.cgd.1c00805

关键词

-

资金

  1. Croatian Science Foundation [IP-2019-04-1868]
  2. Croatian Government
  3. European Union [KK.01.1.1.02.0016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A database survey and structural study reveal that protonation and N-methylation increase the probability of halogen atoms participating in halogen bonds in halogenopyridinium cations, although chloropyridines have a lower probability. Crystal structures show that iodo- and bromopyridinium cations form shorter halogen-bonding contacts, while chloropyridinium cations mostly form longer or fail to form halogen bonds. DFT study indicates an increase in the electrostatic potential of the halogen sigma-hole after protonation and N-methylation, but it is not always the most positive site, allowing for alternate binding sites.
We have performed a database survey and a structural and computational study of the potential and the limitations of halogenopyridinium cations as halogen bond donors. The database survey demonstrated that adding a positive charge on a halogenopyridine ring increases the probability that the halogen atom will participate in a halogen bond, although for chloropyridines it remains below 60%. Crystal structures of both protonated and N-methylated monohalogenated pyridinium cations revealed that the iodo- and bromopyridinium cations always form halogen-bonding contacts with the iodide anions shorter than the sum of the vdW radii, while chloropyridinium cations mostly participate in longer contacts or fail to form halogen bonds. Although a DFT study of the electrostatic potential has shown that both protonation and N-methylation of halogenopyridines leads to a considerable increase in the ESP of the halogen sigma-hole, it is generally not the most positive site on the cation, allowing for alternate binding sites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据