4.7 Article

Intermolecular Interactions of Organic Fluorine Seen in Perspective

期刊

CRYSTAL GROWTH & DESIGN
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.cgd.1c01315

关键词

-

资金

  1. Cambridge Service for Data Driven Discovery (CSD3)
  2. Dell EMC
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/P020259/1]
  4. Science and Technology Facilities Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the impact of different types of fluorine interactions on molecular packing was assessed. The results revealed that there are influential fluorine interactions, which are not necessarily the strongest. It was also noted that despite the low polarizability of fluorine, its intramolecular environment can greatly influence its interactions. Additionally, the amphiphilic nature of the trifluoromethyl group was observed. This objective analysis of organic fluorine interactions yielded many valuable insights.
In this study, we have assessed the influence that different types of fluorine interactions have on how molecules pack. This was done by taking each type of interaction in turn and establishing the ratio of its frequency of occurrence in organic crystal structures to the frequency expected if packing were random. The results allow us to see fluorine interactions in perspective: which are the most influential and which the least. Only a few of the interactions occur more often than would be expected by chance, and those few are not the strongest interactions that fluorine can make. The intramolecular environment of fluorine can strongly influence the interactions it makes, despite the general view that this element has low polarizability. The amphiphilic nature of the trifluoromethyl group is clearly seen, but FmiddotmiddotmiddotF interactions between -CF3 fluorine atoms occur appreciably more often than expected by chance only in centrosymmetric structures. Many other insights were obtained in this objective analysis of the interactions of organic fluorine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据