4.3 Article

Ne-liquefaction system development for the 940 nm infrared optical characteristics measurement

期刊

CRYOGENICS
卷 121, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2021.103411

关键词

Liquid neon; Refractive index; Transmittance; Infrared

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52007186, 51877209]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFE0301405]
  3. Research fund of State Key Laboratory of Technologies in Space Cryogenic Propellants [SKLTSCP202001]
  4. CAS Key Laboratory of Cryogenics, Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry [CRYOQN201904]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a Ne-liquefaction system cooled by a G-M cryocooler, with theoretical analysis of its heat load and liquefied rate. The experimental results show that the system can reliably achieve the liquefaction of neon gas, providing valuable database for infrared equipment.
A Ne-liquefaction system cooled by a G-M cryocooler was developed. The heat load and liquefied rate of the system were analyzed theoretically. The neon gas was liquefied over 340 min while the condenser chamber was cooled down to 26.7 K. The gas pressures of the heat exchanger inlet and condenser are directly proportional to its absolute temperature, which decreased with the reduction of cryostat system temperature. The pressure of the heat exchanger inlet decreased from 105 kPa to 100.4 kPa with the pressure of the condenser decreased from 101 kPa to 100.1 kPa. Neon gas with a purity of 99.999% was used in liquefaction and the mass flow is set to 0.173 g/s. The production rate of liquid neon is determined to be 0.52 L/h. The liquid neon was collected in a glass vacuum dewar with a transparent window, which allows to observe the liquid level and conduct the optical tests. The refractive index and transmittance of the 940 nm infrared in liquid neon are 1.103 and 99.85%, respectively. The parameters will provide a valuable database on infrared equipment with liquid neon as a cryogen.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据