4.7 Review

Application of starch-based nanoparticles and cyclodextrin for prebiotics delivery and controlled glucose release in the human gut: a review

期刊

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION
卷 63, 期 23, 页码 6126-6137

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2022.2028127

关键词

Nanoparticles; diabetes; probiotic function; delivery; blood glucose control

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reviews the preparation and properties of several starch-based nanoparticles and cyclodextrins derivatives, focusing on their mechanisms in modulating glucose release and gut microbiome in the gastrointestinal tract. The authors suggest that these edible nanomaterials, through encapsulation and protection of prebiotics or bioactive components, can achieve probiotic functions, providing valuable information for designing functional foods to improve human health.
Starches are a major constituent of staple foods and are the main source of energy in the human diet (55-70%). In the gastrointestinal tract, starches are hydrolyzed into glucose by alpha-amylase and alpha-glucosidase, which leads to a postprandial glucose elevation. High levels of blood glucose levels over sustained periods may promote type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity. Increasing consumption of starchy foods with a lower glycemic index may therefore contribute to improved health. In this paper, the preparation and properties of several starch-based nanoparticles (SNPs) and cyclodextrins (CDs) derivatives are reviewed. In particular, we focus on the various mechanisms responsible for the ability of these edible nanomaterials to modulate glucose release and the gut microbiome in the gastrointestinal tract. The probiotic functions are achieved through encapsulation and protection of prebiotics or bioactive components in foods or the human gut. This review therefore provides valuable information that could be used to design functional foods for improving human health and wellbeing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据