4.7 Review

Ultrasonication effects on physicochemical properties of biopolymer-based films: A comprehensive review

期刊

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION
卷 63, 期 21, 页码 5044-5062

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2021.2012420

关键词

Ultrasonication; biopolymer; film; physicochemical properties

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biopolymeric films, made from materials such as starch, cellulose, protein, chitosan, gelatin, and polyvinyl alcohol, have complete biodegradability. However, these films often have poor moisture resistance and mechanical properties. Ultrasonication, a promising technology, can improve the physicochemical properties of biopolymeric films, including mechanical properties, transparency, color, microstructure, gas permeability, and thermal performance.
Biopolymeric films manufactured from materials such as starch, cellulose, protein, chitosan, gelatin, and polyvinyl alcohol are widely applied due to their complete biodegradability. While biopolymer-based films exhibit good gas barriers and optical properties when used in packaging, poor moisture resistance and mechanical properties limit their further application. Ultrasonication is a promising, effective technology for resolving these shortcomings, with its high efficiency, environmentally friendly nature, and safety. This review briefly introduces basic ultrasonication principles and their main effects on mechanical properties, transparency, color, microstructure, water vapor permeability, and oxygen resistance. We also describe the thermal performance of biopolymeric films. While ultrasonication has many positive effects on the physicochemical properties of biopolymeric films, many factors influence their behavior during film preparation, including power density, amplitude, treatment time, frequency, and the inherent properties of the source materials. This review focuses on biopolymers as film-forming materials and comprehensively discusses the promotional effects of ultrasonication on their physicochemical properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据