4.5 Review

Revisiting approaches to and considerations for urinalysis and urine culture reflexive testing

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10408363.2021.1988048

关键词

Dipsticks; microscopy; urinalysis; urine culture; urinary tract infection; reflex testing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review summarizes studies that evaluated reflexive urine microscopy and reflexive urine culture performance, particularly in the context of urinary tract infections. It also examines the reported clinical outcomes from reflexive urinalysis interventions and their impact on antibiotic stewardship efforts.
Urinalysis is considered the world's oldest laboratory test. Today, many laboratories use macroscopic urinalysis as a screening tool to determine when to subject urine samples for a microscopic urinalysis and/or bacterial culture. While reflexive urine microscopy has been practiced for decades, and reflexive urine culture, more recently, evidence-based guidelines regarding optimal reflexive criteria and workflows are lacking. Standard approaches are hindered, in part, by a lack of harmonization of urinalysis and urine culture practices, heterogeneity in patient populations that are studied, and lack of provider adherence to recommended practices. This review summarizes studies that have evaluated the performance of reflexive urine microscopy and reflexive urine culture, particularly in the context of urinary tract infections. It also examines reported clinical outcomes from reflexive urinalysis interventions and their impact on antibiotic stewardship efforts. Finally, it discusses laboratory operational considerations for the implementation of reflexive algorithms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据