4.6 Article

Beyond the Alveolar Epithelium: Plasma Soluble Receptor for Advanced Glycation End Products Is Associated With Oxygenation Impairment, Mortality, and Extrapulmonary Organ Failure in Children With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

期刊

CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
卷 50, 期 5, 页码 837-847

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005373

关键词

acute; respiratory distress syndrome; inflammation; multiple organ dysfunction syndrome; pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome; soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products; surfactant protein-D

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [K23HL085526, R01HL114484]
  2. NIH National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive Kidney Diseases [T32DK10468704]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the relationship between plasma soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products (sRAGE) and primary pulmonary dysfunction, extrapulmonary organ dysfunction, and mortality in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. The results show that sRAGE is associated with extrapulmonary organ dysfunction and markers of inflammation in ARDS patients, and is also related to mortality in children with indirect lung injury.
OBJECTIVES: Soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products is a known plasma marker of alveolar epithelial injury. However, RAGE is also expressed on cell types beyond the lung, and its activation leads to up-regulation of pro-inflammatory mediators. We sought to examine the relationship between plasma soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products and primary pulmonary dysfunction, extrapulmonary organ dysfunction, and mortality in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome patients at two early time points following acute respiratory distress syndrome diagnosis and compare these results to plasma surfactant protein-D, a marker of pure alveolar epithelial injury. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Five academic PICUs. PATIENTS: Two hundred fifty-eight pediatric patients 30 days to 18 years old meeting Berlin Criteria for acute respiratory distress syndrome. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Plasma was collected for soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products and surfactant protein-D measurements within 24 hours (day 1) and 48 to 72 hours (day 3) after acute respiratory distress syndrome diagnosis. Similar to surfactant protein-D, plasma soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products was associated with a higher oxygenation index (p < 0.01) and worse lung injury score (p < 0.001) at the time of acute respiratory distress syndrome diagnosis. However, unlike surfactant protein-D, plasma soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products was associated with worse extrapulmonary Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction score during ICU stay (day 3; p < 0.01) and positively correlated with plasma levels of interleukin-6 (p < 0.01), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (p < 0.01), and angiopoietin-2 (p < 0.01). Among children with indirect lung injury, plasma soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products was associated with mortality independent of age, sex, race, cancer/bone marrow transplant, and Pediatric Risk of Mortality score (day 3; odds ratio, 3.14; 95% CI, 1.46-6.75; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Unlike surfactant protein-D, which is primarily localized to the alveolar epithelium plasma soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products is systemically expressed and correlates with markers of inflammation, extrapulmonary multiple organ dysfunction, and death in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome with indirect lung injury. This suggests that unlike surfactant protein-D, soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products is a multifaceted marker of alveolar injury and increased inflammation and that receptor for advanced glycation end products activation may contribute to the pathogenesis of multiple organ failure among children with indirect acute respiratory distress syndrome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据