4.6 Article

The neural inhibition network is causally involved in the disembodiment effect of linguistic negation

期刊

CORTEX
卷 147, 期 -, 页码 72-82

出版社

ELSEVIER MASSON, CORP OFF
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.11.015

关键词

Embodied cognition; Negation; Action-language; Inhibition; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

资金

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades [RTI 2018098730-B-I00, BES-2016-078438]
  2. European Regional Development Funds [RTI 2018098730-B-I00, BES-2016-078438]
  3. Bial foundation [347/18]
  4. Fondazione del Monte di Bologna e Ravenna [339bis/2017]
  5. Cogito foundation [R-117/13, 14-139-R]
  6. Ministero Istruzione Universita e Ricerca [2017N7WCLP]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Applying negation in action contexts reduces motor system activation. The right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG), a key area of the inhibitory control system, was found to contribute to the processing of negated action-sentences in the primary motor cortex (M1). Modulating rIFG suppressed the inhibitory effect of negation, resulting in equal motor excitability for negative and affirmative action sentences.
Negation applied to action contexts reduces the activation of the motor system. According to the Reusing Inhibition for Negation (RIN) hypothesis, such disembodiment effect occurs because understanding negations engages the reuse of inhibitory control mechanisms. Here, we investigated whether the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG) -a key area of the inhibitory control system -contributes to primary motor cortex (M1) processing of negated action-sentences. Using a perturb-and-measure paradigm, we applied off-line low-frequency repetitive TMS (rTMS) over the rIFG, before performing a reading task involving action and attentional sentences presented in both affirmative or negative form. During the reading task, motor excitability was assessed by recording motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) induced by single-pulse TMS (spTMS) over the left M1, at two loci in the sentence: the verb or the object. Results show that after sham stimulation (baseline), motor excitability measured on the verb, was reduced for negative, compared to affirmative action sentences. Crucially, neuromodulation of rIFG suppressed this inhibitory effect of negation, since motor excitability was equaled for negative and affirmative action sentences. As expected, no effect of negation was observed for attentional sentences or when the pulse was delivered over the object. Our study confirms that understanding negative action sentences inhibits M1. This effect took place at an early stage of semantic processing (i.e., while processing the verb in our task), and faded at a later time-point. Critically, by highlighting a causal role of rIFG in this motor inhibition, we provide direct neurophysiological support to the RIN hypothesis.(c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据