4.6 Article

Different underlying mechanisms for high and low arousal in probabilistic learning in humans

期刊

CORTEX
卷 143, 期 -, 页码 180-194

出版社

ELSEVIER MASSON, CORP OFF
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.07.002

关键词

Decision making; Arousal; Learning; Sleep; Physical exercise

资金

  1. University of Granada Postdoctoral Fellowship [2019/P7/100]
  2. Junta de Andaluca [DOC_00225]
  3. Ministerio de Economa y Competitividad [PSI2016-75956-P, PID2019-105635GB-I00]
  4. Wellcome Trust Biomedical Research Fellowship [WT093811MA]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Humans have the unique ability to adapt to changing environments by updating information and adjusting behavior, with cognitive flexibility being modulated differently by high and low arousal fluctuations. Low arousal leads to increased decision volatility and decreased behavioral performance, while high arousal results in increased perseverative behavior and performance decline.
Humans are uniquely capable of adapting to highly changing environments by updating relevant information and adjusting ongoing behaviour accordingly. Here we show how this ability-termed cognitive flexibility-is differentially modulated by high and low arousal fluctuations. We implemented a probabilistic reversal learning paradigm in healthy par-ticipants as they transitioned towards sleep or physical extenuation. The results revealed, in line with our pre-registered hypotheses, that low arousal leads to diminished behav-ioural performance through increased decision volatility, while performance decline under high arousal was attributed to increased perseverative behaviour. These findings provide evidence for distinct patterns of maladaptive decision-making on each side of the arousal inverted u-shaped curve, differentially affecting participants' ability to generate stable evidence-based strategies, and introduces wake-sleep and physical exercise transitions as complementary experimental models for investigating neural and cognitive dynamics. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据