4.8 Review

Insight into the electrolyte strategies for aqueous zinc ion batteries

期刊

COORDINATION CHEMISTRY REVIEWS
卷 452, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2021.214297

关键词

Organic/inorganic hybrid zinc salts; Ultra-high concentration; Cross-linked hydrogel; Bio-electrolyte

资金

  1. NSAF joint Fund [U1830106]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1632114]
  3. Science and Technology Innovation 2025 Major Program of Ningbo [2018B10061]
  4. K.C. Wong Magna Fund in Ningbo University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review discusses the electrolyte strategies for rechargeable aqueous zinc ion batteries (AZIBs), including diverse electrolytes, concentration choices, and flexible hydrogel electrolytes, as well as prospects for biocompatible or biodegradable bio-electrolytes as potential candidates.
Energy crisis caused by traditional energy utilization technology intensifies the demand for high energy density and environmentally friendly secondary batteries. As prospective alternative energy source with high capacity, rechargeable aqueous zinc ion batteries (AZIBs) have raised great concern. In AZIBs, electrolyte plays an important role in determining operating window, electrochemical performance, security, flexibility and cost. This review describes the insight into the electrolyte strategies for AZIBs. Firstly, diverse electrolytes consisting of organic, inorganic and hybrid zinc salts are classified and evaluated by chemical composition and property. Secondly, the choice of electrolyte concentration containing moderate and ultra-high concentration is discussed. Thirdly, flexible hydrogel electrolytes are introduced by different cross-linking types, including chemical cross-linking, physical cross-linking and uncross-linking. Fourthly, aqueous bio-electrolytes are prospected as good biocompatible or biodegradable candidate. Finally, the bottleneck and possible future development direction are put forward for the electrolytes of AZIBs. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据