4.7 Article

An investigation of inorganic fillers on rheological properties and tensile strength of epoxy repair coating using mixture design method

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 307, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124866

关键词

Inorganic filler; Epoxy coating; Rheology; Tensile strength; Mixing design

资金

  1. National Key Research and Develop-ment Program of China [2020YFC1511902]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51779085, 51979090]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effect of different fillers on the rheological properties and tensile strength of epoxy coatings, established a multiple linear regression model, and obtained the optimal coating formulation. The results showed that different fillers have different effects on the coating properties, which can be adjusted according to specific requirements.
In the process of repairing concrete structures with epoxy coatings, fillers are added for modification so that the coating has sagging resistance and good mechanical properties. This requires comprehensive material design. In this paper, three inorganic fillers (cement, bentonite, and talc) were used to study the effect of fillers on the rheological properties (viscosity, thixotropy) and tensile strength of epoxy coatings through a mixture design method. A multiple linear regression model was established, and the optimal epoxy coating mix was finally obtained. The results showed that the increase of cement content was negatively related to the thixotropy of epoxy coating, but it promoted the tensile strength of the coating. On the contrary, bentonite had a positive effect on the thixotropy of the coating and a negative effect on the tensile strength of the coating. In terms of the shear thinning index, an increase of 1% of the bentonite content can increase the shear thinning index by 1.85 times. Finally, the proportion range of epoxy repair coating that meets the actual engineering needs was obtained through multiple optimization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据