4.7 Article

Lightweight expanded clay aggregate properties based on laboratory testing

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 313, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125486

关键词

Lightweight expanded clay aggregate; LECA; Water absorption; Lightweight aggregates

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper analyzes some properties of the LECA 10/20 manufactured by Arlita in Portugal, studying its weight density, water absorption, deformability, and shear resistance based on extensive tests. Results obtained from this set of tests are directly applicable to the design of LECA fillings, and a novel model is presented to estimate water absorption of LECA grains over time.
Lightweight expanded clay aggregate (LECA) is a manufactured aggregate with many uses in construction, such as aggregate for the lightweight concrete or like geotechnical fill. The properties of the material may vary depending on the manufacturer or the applications envisaged for the aggregate. This paper makes an analysis of some properties of the LECA 10/20 (grain size between 10 and 20 mm) manufactured in Portugal by Arlita. The weight density of the grain and the aggregate, water absorption, deformability or resistance to shear are studied based on an extensive set of tests carried out in the Laboratorio de Geotecnia of CEDEX in Madrid (Spain). Among other tests, the dimension and dry weight density of more than 1500 grains has been determined. Direct shear tests of 300 mm were made, 6 '' triaxial tests, confined compression tests or water absorption tests over time (keeping samples submerged for more than 18 months) were carried out. Throughout the article, a comparison is made between the results obtained and other results available in the scientific literature. The results obtained from this set of tests are directly applicable to the design of LECA fillings. And a novel model is presented that allows estimating the water absorption of LECA grains over time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据