4.4 Article

Selective counter design in quantum-dot cellular automata nanotechnology

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cpe.6798

关键词

counter; power consumption; QCA; quantum-dot cellular automata

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this article, novel counters based on QCA technology are designed by introducing a new D flip-flop and modifying it to have set and reset abilities. The proposed counters are able to selectively count from different ranges, with improvements in terms of cell number, occupied area, delay, total energy, and average energy dissipation compared to previous designs. The proposed selective counter counting from 2 to 5 is a new contribution to the field. Simulation results validate the theoretical expectations.
In this article novel counters based on quantum-dot cellular automata (QCA) nanotechnology is designed. To have proper counter design, first new D flip-flop with appropriate number of cells, area and delay is designed. Then, this flip-flop is changed to have flip-flop with set and reset abilities. Therefore, the proposed flip-flop is used to design selective counters which can count for example from 0-5 or 2-5. However, in this article, compared to the best designs of the past works the number of cells, cross-sectional area and delay are reduced by 3.57%, 18.18%, and 25% in counting 0-7 and the cell and cross-sectional area are reduced by 46.88% and 52.17% in counting 0-5. In addition, in counter which can count from 0-7, the total and average energies are improved about 22.3% and 21.83% respectively. Also, for counters which counts from 0-5, the total and average energy dissipation has been improved about 53.01% and 53.08% respectively. It should be noted that the proposed selective counter in QCA technology which counts from 2 to 5 (both lower and upper values are different form 0 and 2(n)-1) is firstly designed in this article. The proposed designs have few number of cells, small occupied area and low delay. Simulation results prove the theoretical anticipation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据