4.7 Article

Quantification of anomalies in rats' spinal cords using autoencoders

期刊

COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 138, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104939

关键词

Digital pathology; Micro-CT; Anomaly detection; Autoencoder; Semi-supervised learning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper analyzes micro-CT scans of rat spinal cords to generate lesion progression through the aggregation of anomaly-based scores. Using semi-supervised deviation-based anomaly detection algorithms, several models were able to generate 3D lesion quantifications with high correlations to the true data, reaching an average correlation of 0.83.
Computed tomography (CT) scans and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of spines are state-of-the-art for the evaluation of spinal cord lesions. This paper analyses micro-CT scans of rat spinal cords with the aim of generating lesion progression through the aggregation of anomaly-based scores. Since reliable labelling in spinal cords is only reasonable for the healthy class in the form of untreated spines, semi-supervised deviation-based anomaly detection algorithms are identified as powerful approaches. The main contribution of this paper is a large evaluation of different autoencoders and variational autoencoders for aggregated lesion quantification and a resulting spinal cord lesion quantification method that generates highly correlating quantifications. The conducted experiments showed that several models were able to generate 3D lesion quantifications of the data. These quantifications correlated with the weakly labelled true data with one model, reaching an average correlation of 0.83. We also introduced an area-based model, which correlated with a mean of 0.84. The possibility of the complementary use of the autoencoder-based method and the area feature were also discussed. Additionally to improving medical diagnostics, we anticipate features built on these quantifications to be useful for further applications like clustering into different lesions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据