4.7 Article

Transferability of extended warranty in the presence of a P2P secondary market

期刊

COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
卷 160, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2021.107541

关键词

Transferability; Extended warranty; Secondary market; Add-on service; Pricing

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71571141, 71971166]
  2. Key Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China [71732006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study shows that the transferability of extended warranties is related to the manufacturer's optimal pricing decisions, with manufacturers more likely to offer transferable extended warranties when costs are low and non-transferable ones when costs are high. Additionally, manufacturers can use optional extended warranties to segment the market.
In addition to the base warranty, many manufacturers offer the extended warranty, which may be bundled with new products or be voluntarily purchased by consumers at a separate price. Consumers may resell the used products in a peer-to-peer (P2P) secondary market in which the used products with extended warranty can attract more consumers. Thus, manufacturers need to decide whether the extended warranty can be transferred from the original owner to the buyer in the secondary market. In this paper, we develop an analytical model to investigate the manufacturer's optimal pricing decisions of the product and the extended warranty, as well as the transferability of extended warranty. Our results show that the manufacturer prefers to offer a transferable extended warranty when the warranty service cost is low, and prefers to provide a nontransferable extended warranty when the cost is high. The manufacturer can take an advantage of the optional extended warranty to segment the market. We also find that the manufacturer is more likely to provide a transferable extended warranty when the production cost is high or the used products fail at a high probability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据