4.7 Article

Energy-efficient scheduling for a flexible job shop with machine breakdowns considering machine idle time arrangement and machine speed level selection

期刊

COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
卷 161, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2021.107677

关键词

Flexible job shop; Dynamic scheduling; Machine breakdowns; Energy-saving; Batch transportation rule

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By considering two energy-saving measures and batch transportation rule, a dynamic scheduling mathematical model for flexible job shop is established, and the NSGA-II algorithm is used to effectively reduce energy consumption and maximum completion time.
Reasonable production optimization method can effectively reduce the total energy consumption of flexible job shop. In order to address the dynamic scheduling problem of flexible job shop under the machine breakdowns constraint, a method of calculating machine energy consumption and completion time under different states is proposed. In this method, two energy-saving measures for machining, machine idle time arrangement and machine speed level selection, are considered. A dynamic scheduling mathematical model of flexible job shop with the goals of minimizing the total energy consumption and maximum completion time of machines is then established. A heuristic multi-objective non-dominated genetic ranking algorithm (NSGA-II) using real number coding and considering batch transportation rule is proposed to solve this problem. The corresponding Pareto frontier solution sets are generated through base case experiments, and the effects of two energy saving measures and batch transportation rule are evaluated in static and dynamic scheduling, respectively, and finally 15 base cases are cited to evaluate the proposed algorithm. The results show that the model and algorithm can effectively reduce energy consumption and maximum completion time, thus reducing the environmental impact and achieving green energy conservation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据