4.7 Article

Moral considerations on social robots in education: A multi-stakeholder perspective

期刊

COMPUTERS & EDUCATION
卷 174, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104317

关键词

Elementary education; Cultural and social implications; Human-computer interface; Improving classroom teaching; Media in education

资金

  1. Dutch Research Council (NWO) [023.010.066]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study identified and compared the moral considerations associated with the introduction of social robots in primary education from the perspective of direct and indirect stakeholders. While there were some conflicting views on certain issues, teachers, parents, and policymakers shared many similarities in their considerations, indicating a potential for alignment on the responsible introduction of social robots in education.
Social robots are a promising new technology for primary education. However, they also introduce practical and moral challenges and there is an increasing demand for guidelines for a responsible, safe introduction of social robots. In this study, we identified and compared the moral considerations associated with the introduction of social robots in primary education from the viewpoint of direct and indirect stakeholders by conducting focus group sessions (N = 118). In total, we identified and compared stakeholder considerations related to 17 moral values. Overall, each of the stakeholder groups considered social robots a potentially valuable tool for education. Many similarities and only few conflicting views across the various stakeholder groups were found. Particularly among the teachers, parents, and policymakers, there were many similarities on the issues reported and their considerations were often aligned. These insights into the moral considerations of the various stakeholders involved, provide a solid base to develop guidelines for implementing social robots in education as requested by scholars and society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据