4.6 Article

Modeling biogas production from anaerobic wastewater treatment plants using radial basis function networks and differential evolution

期刊

COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
卷 157, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2021.107629

关键词

Anaerobic digestion; Artificial neural networks; Biogas; Differential evolution; Fuzzy means; Radial basis function

资金

  1. European Union
  2. Greek national funds through the Operational Program Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation [T1EDK-03714]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces a new method for modeling biogas production from anaerobic digestion treatment plants using artificial neural networks with an efficient radial basis function architecture. The novel RBF training scheme based on the NSFM algorithm is enhanced with a DE optimizer to boost model accuracy, showing superiority over different machine learning approaches in a comparison study.
This study presents a new method for modeling biogas production obtained from anaerobic digestion treatment plants with increased accuracy. The method is based on artificial neural networks (ANNs) and more specifically on the efficient architecture of radial basis function (RBF) networks. A novel RBF training scheme is proposed, based on the non-symmetric fuzzy means (NSFM) algorithm, which has been shown to offer increased accuracy compared to other ANN methods, but cannot handle efficiently a large number of input variables. As this is the case in biogas production modeling, the algorithm is enhanced with an optimizer based on differential evolution (DE), which helps to properly tune the algorithm, ultimately boosting the accuracy of the produced models. The proposed approach is applied for modeling the biogas production on a real world, full-scale operational wastewater treatment plant. A comparison study shows the superiority of the proposed model, compared to different machine learning approaches. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据