4.7 Article

Energy efficient routing protocol using exponentially-ant lion whale optimization algorithm in wireless sensor networks

期刊

COMPUTER NETWORKS
卷 197, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.comnet.2021.108250

关键词

Energy Efficiency; Trust Based Routing; Ant Lion Optimization; Whale Optimization Algorithm; Cluster Head

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, an energy-efficient and trust-based routing model is proposed using the E-ALWO algorithm, which selects cluster heads based on energy and delay constraints.
Energy efficiency is a key challenging task while designing routing model in Wireless Sensor Network (WSN). Various energy efficiency routing approaches are designed to transfer the data packets in a secure path through cluster head (CH), but to increase the lifespan of network and to maintain high scalability poses a complex task in WSN environment. Hence, an energy efficient and trust based routing model is designed using proposed Exponentially-Ant Lion Whale Optimization (E-ALWO) algorithm to route the data packets to receiver. However, the E-ALWO algorithm is derived by the integration of Exponentially Weighted Moving Average (EWMA) concept with Ant Lion Optimization (ALO) and Whale Optimization algorithm (WOA), respectively. However, the proposed model performs the routing process through CH such that the selection of CH is made using ALWO algorithm based on the constraints, namely energy and delay. The optimal and the secure route used for the data transferring process is computed using proposed E-ALWO algorithm based on the fitness measure. The fitness function considers the factors, namely energy, trust, delay, and distance. Moreover, the path with maximal fitness value is accepted as the routing path, by which the data is forwarded to sink node through CH. The average performance measure achieved by the proposed method by considering without attack scenario in terms of delay, residual energy, throughput, and trust is 0.1484sec, 0.4998J, 42984kbps, and 0.5885.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据