4.7 Article

Phase-field simulation of ductile fracture in shell structures

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2021.114019

关键词

Phase-field model; Ductile fracture; Isogeometric; Shell; Multipatch; Adaptive refinement

资金

  1. European Research Council through the ERC Consolidator Grant FDM2 [864482]
  2. Research Council of Norway
  3. German Academic Exchange Service, DAAD, Germany, through the project FATIKA - Isogeometric phase-field modeling of fatigue in slender structures [281247]
  4. NFR
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [864482] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a computational framework for simulating ductile fracture in multipatch shell structures. By studying the mesh dependency of the numerical model and the effectiveness of an adaptive mesh refinement algorithm, important features of ductile fracture can be captured.
In this paper, a computational framework for simulating ductile fracture in multipatch shell structures is presented. A ductile fracture phase-field model at finite strains is combined with an isogeometric Kirchhoff-Love shell formulation. For the application to complex structures, we employ a penalty approach for imposing, at patch interfaces, displacement and rotational continuity and C-0 and C-1 continuity of the phase-field, the latter required if a higher-order phase-field formulation is adopted. We study the mesh dependency of the numerical model and we show that mesh refinement allows for capturing important features of ductile fracture such as cracking along shear bands. Therefore, we investigate the effectiveness of a predictor- corrector algorithm for adaptive mesh refinement based on LR NURBS. Thanks to the adoption of time- and space-adaptivity strategies, it is possible to simulate the failure of complex structures with a reasonable computational effort. Finally, we compare the predictions of the numerical model with experimental results. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据