4.7 Article

Deep learning and crystal plasticity: A preconditioning approach for accurate orientation evolution prediction

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2021.114392

关键词

Neural network; Gated recurrent unit; Crystal plasticity; Taylor model

资金

  1. NSERC/UNENE Research Chair, Canada in Nuclear Materials
  2. MCF Program
  3. AI4D Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Efficient and precise plasticity prediction relies on appropriate data preparation and a well-designed model. This study introduces an unsupervised machine learning-based data preparation method to maximize the trainability of crystal orientation evolution data during deformation, achieving improved test scores and reduced training iterations. The approach shows reasonable agreement between the surrogate model and experimental data, laying a foundation for further data-driven studies in texture evolution prediction.
Efficient and precise prediction of plasticity by data-driven models relies on appropriate data preparation and a well-designed model. Here we introduce an unsupervised machine learning-based data preparation method to maximize the trainability of crystal orientation evolution data during deformation. For Taylor model crystal plasticity data, the preconditioning procedure improves the test score of an artificial neural network from 0.831 to 0.999, while decreasing the training iterations by an order of magnitude. The efficacy of the approach was further improved with a recurrent neural network. Electron backscattered (EBSD) lab measurements of crystal rotation during rolling were compared with the results of the surrogate model, and despite error introduced by Taylor model simplifying assumptions, very reasonable agreement between the surrogate model and experiment was observed. Our method is foundational for further data-driven studies, enabling the efficient and precise prediction of texture evolution from experimental and simulated crystal plasticity results. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据