4.7 Article

MPC based optimization applied to treatment of HCV infections

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106383

关键词

Hepatis C; Model predictive control; Therapy optimization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a strategy to optimize hepatitis C treatment using model predictive control, which successfully reduces treatment costs while maintaining good pharmacological control. The results demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of this approach.
Background and Objective: The recent introduction of antivirals for the treatment of the hepatitis C virus opens new frontiers but also poses a significant burden on public health systems. This paper presents a simulation study in which model predictive control (MPC) is proposed for optimizing the therapy aiming to obtain a reduction of the costs of therapy, while maintaining the best pharmacological control of the infection. Methods: A dynamic model describing the evolution of hepatitis C is deployed as internal model for MPC implementation, using nominal values of parameters. Different closed-loop simulations are presented both in nominal and in mismatch conditions. In addition, a more easily implementable treatment is pro-posed, which is based on a discrete dosage approach, where days on/off therapy are considered instead of continuous therapy modulation. Results: Results show that therapy modulation allows one to achieve the same infection evolution as with full therapy, with a reduction of drug consumption between 10% and 40%. The alternative discrete dosage approach shows similar results achieved with therapy modulation, both in terms of therapy effectiveness and drug consumption reduction. Conclusions: The proposed model predictive control therapy optimization strategies appear to be effec-tive, implementable and robust to model errors. It therefore represents a potentially useful approach to alleviate the burden of HCV therapy cost on national health systems. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据