4.7 Review

Undesirable discoloration in edible fish muscle: Impact of indigenous pigments, chemical reactions, processing, and its prevention

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.12866

关键词

autoxidation; discoloration; hemoglobin; myoglobin; seafood

资金

  1. Prince of SongklaUniversity [AGR6402088N]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fish is rich in proteins and lipids, and its color is influenced by pigments such as myoglobin and astaxanthin. Microbial spoilage and chemical changes can lead to discoloration of meat. Discoloration is affected by various factors like chemical composition, handling, storage, and processing, and methods like vacuum packaging, low-temperature storage, and additives are used to tackle it.
Fish is rich in proteins and lipids, especially those containing polyunsaturated fatty acids, which made them vulnerable to chemical or microbial changes associated with quality loss. Meat color is one of vital criteria indicating the freshness, quality, and acceptability of the meat. Color of meat is governed by the presence of various pigments such as hemoglobin, myoglobin (Mb), and so on. Mb, particularly oxy-form, is responsible for the bright red color of fish muscle, especially tuna, and dark fleshed fish, while astaxanthin (AXT) directly determines the color of salmonids muscle. Microbial spoilage and chemical changes such as oxidation of lipid/proteins result in the autoxidation of Mb or fading of AXT, leading to undesirable color with lower acceptability. The discoloration has been affected by chemical composition, post-harvesting handling or storage, processing, cooking, and so on . To tackle discoloration of fish meat, vacuum or modified atmospheric packaging, low- or ultralow-temperature storage, uses of artificial and natural additives have been employed. This review article provides information regarding the factors affecting color and other quality aspects of fish muscle. Moreover, promising methodologies used to control discoloration are also focused.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据