4.7 Review

A review of artificial neural networks in the constitutive modeling of composite materials

期刊

COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING
卷 224, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109152

关键词

Constitutive modeling; Composite materials; Multiscale modeling; Neural networks

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Machine learning models, especially artificial neural networks, are increasingly used in engineering fields. However, there are still unsolved issues hindering the acceptance of ANN models in the practical design and analysis of composite materials. The emerging machine learning techniques pose both new opportunities and challenges in the data-based design paradigm.
Machine learning models are increasingly used in many engineering fields thanks to the widespread digital data, growing computing power, and advanced algorithms. The most popular machine learning model in recent years is artificial neural networks (ANN). Although many ANN models are used in the constitutive modeling of composite materials, there are still some unsolved issues that hinder the acceptance of ANN models in the practical design and analysis of composite materials and structures. Moreover, the emerging machine learning techniques are posing new opportunities and challenges in the data-based design paradigm. This paper aims to give a state-of-the-art literature review of ANN models in the constitutive modeling of composite materials, focusing on discovering unknown constitutive laws and accelerating multiscale modeling. This review focuses on the general frameworks, benefits, and challenges and opportunities of ANN models to the constitutive modeling of composite materials. Moreover, potential applications of ANN-based constitutive models in composite materials and structures are also discussed. This review is intended to initiate discussion of future research scope and new directions to enable efficient, robust, and accurate data-driven design and analysis of composite materials and structures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据