4.7 Article

Nitric oxide-releasing L-Tryptophan and L-Phenylalanine based Poly(ester urea)s electrospun composite mats as antibacterial and antibiofilm dressing for wound healing

期刊

COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING
卷 229, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109484

关键词

Amino acids based poly(ester urea)s (TP-PEUs); Electrospun nanofiber mats; NO releasing; Antibacterial and antibiofilm properties; Wound healing

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB0309001]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [18ZR1400400, 18ZR1400500, 20ZR1402100]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The L-tryptophan and L-phenylalanine based poly(ester urea)s electrospun composite mats with nitric oxide releasing capability show promising potential in killing bacteria, eliminating biofilms, and preventing infections in infected wound treatment.
Bacterial biofilm often exists in non-healing wounds, and if it cannot be removed promptly, further complications will occur. Bioactive biodegradable wound dressings with the ability to kill bacteria, eliminate biofilms and prevent infections are expected to solve this problem. This study reports the development of a new L-tryptophan and L-phenylalanine-based poly(ester urea)s which aims at fabricating electrospun composite mat with nitric oxide releasing capability for infected wound treatment. The designed L-tryptophan and L-phenylalanine based poly(ester urea)s owned adjustable degradability and good biocompatibility, indicating it could be an ideal biomaterial for wound repair. The electrospun mat was an ideal cargo for steady and continuous delivery with a total concentration of 0.8 mu mol/L of NO. The mats showed obvious advantages in killing the bacteria and destructing biofilms. Such electrospun mats could promote proliferation and improve collagen deposition as well as accelerate wound healing. It suggests that the fabric mats can act as a suitable candidate in infected-wound care applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据