4.7 Article

Evaluation of bending and post-buckling behavior of thin-walled FG beams in geometrical nonlinear regime with CUF

期刊

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
卷 275, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114408

关键词

Geometrical nonlinear analysis; Compositional gradient exponents; Composite structures; Functionally Graded Materials; Carrera Unified Formulation

资金

  1. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the nonlinear behavior of beams with FGM using CUF, extending kinematic variants with LW approach and LE. The displacement and stress distributions of FG beams under different compositional gradient exponents are studied, and it is found that the combined formulation is time-efficient and highly sensitive in determining the nonlinear behavior.
In this paper, the nonlinear behavior of beams with one-dimensional (1D) Functionally Graded Materials (FGM) is investigated by Carrera Unified Formulation (CUF). In the study, kinematic variants of CUF are extended with Lagrange Extension (LE), thus adopting Layer-Wise (LW) approach. In the CUF formulation combined with geometric nonlinear equations, the Lagrangian approximation and Newton-Raphson linearization scheme are used with the method based on arc length constraint. It is assumed that the variation of material properties in the thickness direction follows an exponential grading. The displacement and stress distributions of the Functionally Graded (FG) cantilever beam under transverse/axial loading are investigated for different compositional gradient exponents. The three-dimensional (3D) stress distributions of FG beams are investigated with the 1D CUF model and the results are confirmed by the literature. The effect of the compositional gradient exponent on the mechanical behavior is expressed and it is emphasized that the combined formulation is time-efficient and highly sensitive in determining the nonlinear behavior.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据