4.7 Article

Carbon/basalt hybrid composite bolted joint for improved bearing performance and cost efficiency

期刊

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
卷 275, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114427

关键词

Bolted joints; Hybridization; Laminated composites; Failure mechanism

资金

  1. Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Malaysia, under YUTP [015LC0-250]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the bearing performance and cost efficiency of single-lap, single-bolt joint of carbon/basalt hybrid composite. The hybrid arrangement of basalt layers sandwiched between carbon layers demonstrated improved mechanical performance and cost savings compared to pure carbon-based joints. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that the proposed hybrid scheme exhibited shear failure, different from all other hybrid designs which showed interlaminar failure.
In this study, the bearing performance and cost efficiency of single-lap, single-bolt joint of carbon/basalt hybrid composite were assessed. Two non-hybrid laminate joints (pure basalt fiber and carbon fiber laminate joints), and four hybrid laminate joints (two with sandwich-like stacking sequences and two with non-sandwich-like stacking sequences) were fabricated using a vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding process. In comparison to pure carbon-based joints, the hybrid arrangement of basalt layers sandwiched between carbon layers demonstrated improved mechanical performance (23.4% increase in energy absorption and 4.7% increase in ultimate load) while saving 45% of the cost. The surface morphology of damaged specimens was studied by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) at various stages of the loading process. SEM imaging revealed that the proposed hybrid scheme exhibited shear failure, in contrast to all other hybrid designs, which showed interlaminar failure. This study exhibited a better hybrid laminate joint in terms of performance and cost efficiency; which encourages the use of composites in mid/low-end load-bearing applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据