4.7 Article

Static stability and vibration behavior of graphene platelets reinforced porous sandwich cylindrical panel under non-uniform edge loads using semi-analytical approach

期刊

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
卷 280, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114837

关键词

Sandwich cylindrical panel; FG-GPL-porous core; Non-uniform edge loads; Buckling; Free vibration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The buckling and free vibration characteristics of sandwich cylindrical panel with porous FG-GPL core were investigated, and it was found that performance could be improved by properly tailoring the distribution of GPL and porosity. Different in-plane loading methods led to varied responses, and changes in aspect ratio caused noticeable mode shape alterations.
Buckling and free vibration characteristics of sandwich cylindrical panel with porous functionally graded graphene platelets (FG-GPL) core are investigated using semi-analytical approach. The effective mechanical properties are obtained by using properties of open cell foams and Halpin-Tsai micro mechanical model. The governing equations are obtained using Hamilton's principle, considering a higher order theory to account the transverse shear and solved by Galerkin's method. Effects of nature of in-plane edge load, distribution of porosity and GPL, porosity coefficient, GPL loading, core to total thickness ratio are analyzed in detail. It is shown that for a FG-GPL core sandwich cylindrical panel with high core thickness, even at higher amount of porosity the buckling resistance and free vibration frequency can be improved by properly tailoring both the GPL and porosity distribution. Moreover, a much variation in buckling and free vibration response with the type of in plane loading is observed and evident mode shape changes are observed with increase in aspect ratio. The cylindrical sandwich panel having a core with D-PD porosity variation and I-GPL-P pattern of GPL distribution has the maximum buckling resistance and free vibration frequency value.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据