4.3 Article

Soil Organic Matter Fractions and Enzymes Activities under No-tillage System: Effects of Organomineral and Mineral Fertilizer with Humic Substances

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/00103624.2021.1993886

关键词

Humic acid; phosphatase; Glycine max; Zea mays

资金

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - Brasil (CAPES) [001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the use of organomineral and mineral fertilizers enriched with humic substances can increase organic matter content in the soil and impact soil enzymatic activity, ultimately benefiting crop growth. Additionally, fertilizer application has positive effects on various fractions of soil organic matter and crop yield.
The use of organomineral fertilizer can promote increments of organic matter and affect the enzymatic activity of the soil. The objective of this research was to evaluate the effect of organomineral and mineral fertilizer with humic substances on soil organic matter fractions and enzymes activities. The study was set up in a Xanthic Ferrasol, in the Cerrado region, Brazil. Treatments consisted of two fertilizers and four rates of P fertilizer. The following fertilizers were studied: mineral fertilizer enriched with humic substances (03% of N, 25% of P2O5, 08% of K2O, with 1% humic substance); and granulated organomineral produced from poultry litter and mineral fertilizer (MAP - mono-ammonium phosphate, with 26.6% of P2O5 and 18.2% of organic carbon). Five rates of P were also evaluated (0, 20, 40, 60, and 80 kg ha(-1) of P2O5). The crop production, soil organic matter fraction and enzymes were assessed in the 2014/2015 and 2015/2016 growing seasons. Contents of the total organic carbon, particulate organic carbon, humic acid, fulvic acid, and maize and soybean grain yield were positively influenced by the fertilizer application. Fertilization treatments did not affect the enzymes activities, but they showed positive correlations with particulate organic carbon.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据