4.7 Article

Lignosulfonate-assisted synthesis of platinum nanoparticles deposited on multi-walled carbon nanotubes for biosensing of glucose

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.112222

关键词

Platinum nanoparticles; Multi-walled carbon nanotubes; Lignosulfonate; Electrocatalysis; Glucose biosensor

资金

  1. Polish Ministry of Science [09/11/SBAD/2109]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work presents the preferential adsorption of lignosulfonate on multi-walled carbon nanotubes, leading to the functional platform for platinum nanoparticles deposition. The resulting hybrid material exhibits strong electrocatalytic properties towards hydrogen peroxide and has been used to develop an amperometric biosensor for glucose, demonstrating excellent electrocatalytic activity and rapid response.
It is presented in this work that lignosulfonate (LS) can be preferentially adsorbed on the surface of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) giving rise to the functional platform for platinum nanoparticles (NPt) deposition. The novel MWCNT/LS/NPt hybrid material has been characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transformation infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The morphology of the MWCNT/LS/NPt electrodes has been investigated by atomic force microscopy (AFM). The electrochemical studies of MWCNT/LS/NPt hybrid material revealed strong electrocatalytic properties towards hydrogen peroxide. In addition, the effects of lignosulfonate amount adsorbed at the MWCNT on the voltammetric response of the hydrogen peroxide were discussed and used to select the optimal and effective conditions for the synthesis of the electrode material. An amperometric biosensor for glucose was developed based on the covalent linkage of glucose oxidase (GOx) at the MWCNT/LS/NPt. The enzyme electrode exhibited excellent electrocatalytic activity and rapid response for glucose. The linear range of the glucose determination was 50-1400 mu M and LOD was quantified as 15.67 mu M.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据