4.5 Article

Effects of magnetic fields on stochastic resonance in Hodgkin-Huxley neuronal network driven by Gaussian noise and non-Gaussian noise

期刊

COGNITIVE NEURODYNAMICS
卷 16, 期 3, 页码 707-717

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11571-021-09734-6

关键词

Stochastic resonance; Neuronal network; Gaussian noise; Levy noise; Magnetic fields

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51737003, 51977060, 51607056]
  2. Science and Technology Project of Hebei Education Department, CHINA [BJ2016013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper studied the stochastic resonance in Hodgkin-Huxley neuronal networks under different channel noises and analyzed the effects of electromagnetic field stimulation on resonance. The results indicate that selecting appropriate magnetic field parameters can significantly enhance the resonance amplitude, while excessively strong magnetic fields may have detrimental effects. Magnetic fields may induce the enhancement of resonance amplitude by increasing firing frequency and spiking regularity.
Stochastic resonance is a remarkable phenomenon that can enhance signal processing by the addition of random noise. However, the effect of magnetic fields on stochastic resonance under channel noises has been inadequately studied. In this paper, the stochastic resonance in Hodgkin-Huxley neuronal network under Gaussian channel noises and non-Gaussian channel noise were studied, and the effects of electromagnetic field stimulation on stochastic resonance were considered. The results indicate that stochastic resonance in neuronal networks can be induced by Gaussian channel noise and non-Gaussian Levy channel noise, and stochastic resonance may occur more easily under Levy channel noise. The resonance amplitude was significantly improved by selecting appropriate parameters of the magnetic field, while, a too strong magnetic field can be detrimental to the resonance amplitude. Magnetic fields may induce the enhancement of the resonance amplitude by increasing the firing frequency and spiking regularity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据