4.5 Article

Long-Term Effectiveness of Three Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies in Resistant Chronic Migraine Patients Based on the MIDAS score

期刊

CNS DRUGS
卷 36, 期 2, 页码 191-202

出版社

ADIS INT LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s40263-021-00893-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. Universita degli Studi di Firenze within the CRUI-CARE Agreement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of three monoclonal antibodies against the calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway (erenumab, galcanezumab, and fremanezumab) in patients with resistant chronic migraine. The results showed that all three anti-CGRP mAbs were effective and safe, with a high percentage of patients achieving a ≥ 50% reduction in Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score.
Background Criteria, including clinical features and effective outcomes, for access and persistence of novel but costly treatments may vary between countries, thus affecting the health of patients. Monoclonal antibodies against the calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway (anti-CGRP mAbs) for migraine treatment are currently prescribed following strict criteria. Objective The aim was to assess the effectiveness and safety of three anti-CGRP mAbs (erenumab, galcanezumab, and fremanezumab) in consecutive resistant chronic migraine patients presenting at our Headache Center and the impact of criteria set by the Italian Medicines Agency to start and continue (achieving a >= 50% reduction in Migraine Disability Assessment [MIDAS] score) with treatment under the reimbursement program. Methods A monocentric, prospective, cohort study was conducted, enrolling 203 severe (resistant to three or more preventive treatments) chronic migraine patients (84.7% with medication overuse) treated with erenumab (47.2%), galcanezumab (36.5%), or fremanezumab (16.3%), with up to 12 months follow-up. Patients completed a headache diary that included monthly migraine days (MMDs), number of analgesics and days with analgesic use, and patient-reported outcome questionnaires (MIDAS, Headache Impact Test 6 [HIT-6] questionnaires, and the Patient Global Impression of Change [PGIC] scale). Moreover, percentages of patients showing >= 50%, >= 75% and 100% reduction in MMDs (responder rates) were calculated at different follow-ups. A subgroup analysis was performed for patients with 12-month follow-up. Potential predictors of response were assessed at different follow-ups. Results In the overall population, all three anti-CGRP mAbs were similarly effective and dropouts were 17.2%. The percentage of patients with >= 50% reduction in MMDs (min-max 36.4-56.8%) and in monthly analgesic consumption (51.1-75.7%) was inferior to the percentage of patients who reported a >= 50% reduction in MIDAS score (89.5-100%). HIT-6 score was also consistently reduced at all follow-ups. In patients with a 12-month follow-up, MIDAS and HIT-6 scores were also reduced at all follow-ups compared with baseline, with 84.4-100% of patients achieving a >= 50% reduction in MIDAS score, and patients with a >= 50% response rate ranging from 36.4 to 66.6%. No severe adverse events were recorded. Fewer migraine days at baseline were associated with >= 50% response rate at 1 month and fewer MMDs, years of chronic migraine, and monthly analgesic use at 6 months. Conclusion In resistant chronic migraine patients, anti-CGRP mAbs are effective and safe. A >= 50% reduction in MIDAS score seems to be the most advantageous outcome measure in this setting, which allows most severe migraine patients to persist with treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据