4.5 Article

Microbiome differences in periodontal, peri-implant, and healthy sites: a cross-sectional pilot study

期刊

CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS
卷 26, 期 3, 页码 2771-2781

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-04253-4

关键词

Microbiome; Periodontitis; Peri-implantitis; Biomarkers; Polymerase chain reaction

资金

  1. University of Catania, Italy
  2. Second Level Master's Degree in Complex Oral Rehabilitation University of Catania

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The microbial profiles of healthy and diseased periodontal and peri-implant sites were found to be distinct, suggesting the potential for identifying biomarkers for periodontal health and disease and developing new strategies for treatment.
Objectives To explore microbial communities associated with health and disease status around teeth and dental implants. Materials and methods A total of 10 healthy, 24 periodontitis, and 24 peri-implant sites from 24 patients were sequenced by next-generation sequencing. Microbial DNA was extracted and 16S rRNA gene was amplified. Bioinformatic analyses were performed using quantitative insights into microbial ecology (QIIME), linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSE), and STAMP. Results Differences in microbial diversity across three types of sites were not statistically significant. Several genera and species were more prevalent in healthy compared with diseased sites, including Lautropia, Rothia and Capnocytophaga and Kingella. Among diseased sites, Peptostreptococcaceae, Dialister, Mongibacterium, Atopobium, and Filifactor were over-represented in peri-implantitis sites, while Bacteroidales was more abundant in periodontitis sites. Conclusions Diseased periodontal and peri-implant sites and corresponding healthy sites have distinct microbiological profiles. These findings suggest that microbial analyses could identify biomarkers for periodontal health and disease and lead to the development of new strategies to improve periodontal health and treat peri-implant and periodontal diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据