4.5 Article

Changes in Th1/Th2-related cytokine expression in the saliva of patients with recurrent aphthous stomatitis before and after prednisone treatment

期刊

CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS
卷 26, 期 1, 页码 1089-1093

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-04349-x

关键词

Cytokines; Prednisone; Recurrent aphthous stomatitis; Saliva; T helper cell

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [82074502, 82101008]
  2. Shanghai Municipal Health Committee [20174Y0098]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that systemic prednisone treatment significantly reduced the levels of cytokine expression in the saliva of minor RAS patients and promoted a Th1/Th2 balance.
Objectives To investigate the changes of T helper cell (Th)1/Th2-related cytokine expression in the saliva of minor recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) patients before and after treatment with systemic prednisone. Methods A total of 101 patients with RAS and 15 participants with normal oral mucosa as controls were enrolled in this study. The levels of cytokine expression in the whole unstimulated saliva were examined using a multiplex bead-based cytometric bead array before and after prednisone treatment at a starting dose of 15 mg/day. Results The levels of salivary interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, interferon (IFN)-gamma, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) in RAS patients were significantly higher than those of the normal controls (all P < 0.001). Importantly, the levels of salivary IL-6, IL-10, IFN-gamma, and TNF-alpha in RAS patients were significantly decreased following prednisone treatment (all P < 0.001). Moreover, the IFN-gamma to IL-4 ratio (mean: 26.9) was significantly (P < 0.001) decreased after treatment, which almost returned to normal (mean: 24.4; P > 0.05). Conclusion This preliminary study demonstrates for the first time that prednisone exerts a significant therapeutic role against RAS through decreasing salivary cytokine levels and promoting a Th1/Th2 balance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据