4.5 Article

STAndard Reporting of CAries Detection and Diagnostic Studies (STARCARDDS)

期刊

CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS
卷 26, 期 2, 页码 1947-1955

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-04173-3

关键词

Caries detection; Caries diagnostics; Caries assessment; Methodology; Laboratory studies; Reference standard

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) [SCHU-3217/1-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents recommendations from an international workshop on methodology and reporting of caries diagnostic studies. The STARCARDDS checklist was modified to focus on issues like sample selection, blinding, and detailed reporting of results to improve the quality and comparability of future studies on caries detection and diagnosis.
Aim The aim of this paper is to present recommendations from an international workshop which evaluated the methodology and reporting of caries diagnostic studies. As a unique feature, this type of studies is focused on caries lesion detection and assessment, and many of them are carried out in vitro, because of the possibility of histological validation of the whole caries spectrum. This feature is not well covered in the existing reporting STARD guideline within the EQUATOR Network. Participants and methods An international working group of 13 cariology researchers was formed. The STARD checklist was reviewed and modified for caries detection and diagnosis purposes, in a three-step process of evaluation, consensual modification, and delivery during three 2-day workshops over 18 months. Special attention was paid to reporting requirements of caries studies that solely focus on reliability. Results The STARD checklist was modified in 14/30 items, with an emphasis on issues of sample selection (tooth selection in in vitro studies), blinding, and detailed reporting of results. Conclusion Following STARCARDDS (STAndard Reporting of CAries Detection and Diagnostic Studies) is expected to result in complete reporting of study design and methodology in future caries diagnosis and detection experiments both in vivo and in vitro, thus allowing for better comparability of studies and higher quality of systematic reviews.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据