期刊
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 75, 期 1, 页码 170-175出版社
OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciab1016
关键词
vaccine efficacy; vaccine effectiveness; influenza; vaccines
This study analyzes the comparability of relative vaccine effectiveness across different studies and suggests that this comparability is dependent on the absolute vaccine effectiveness of the comparator vaccine. These findings have implications for the design of influenza vaccine studies and data reporting.
Background Relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) are metrics commonly reported to compare absolute VE (aVE) of 2 vaccine products. Methods Estimates of rVE for enhanced influenza vaccines (eIV) vs standard inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) have been assessed across different seasons, influenza-specific endpoints, and nonspecific endpoints (eg, all-cause cardiovascular hospitalizations). To illustrate the challenges of comparability across studies, we conducted a scenario analysis to evaluate the effects of varying absolute VE (aVE) of IIV (ie, as compared with placebo) on the interpretation of rVE of eIV vs IIV. Results We show that estimates of rVE might not be comparable across studies because additional benefits commensurate with a given estimate of rVE are dependent on the aVE for the comparator vaccine, which can depend on factors such as host response to vaccine, virus type, and clinical endpoint evaluated. Conclusions These findings have implications for interpretation of rVE across studies and for sample size considerations in future trials. This scenario analysis demonstrates challenges in interpreting relative vaccine efficacy and effectiveness measures for influenza vaccines, and provides onward implications for data reporting and study design.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据