Keratinized mucosa changes around one-stage implants: A prospective case series

Background The need of an adequate band of keratinized tissue (KT) to maintain periodontal health around teeth as well as around implants has been a debated topic over many years but still no conclusions have been drawn. Objectives This prospective case series evaluates the changes undergone by the keratinized mucosa (KM) and the soft tissue volume around non-submerged implants before the prosthetic rehabilitation. Material and Methods A total of 40 patients were included. The primary outcome was to analyze the width of the KM at both buccal and lingual aspects compared to the pre-existing KT in the edentulous ridge only in mandibular (pre)molar area. The mucogingival line was marked with a surgical pen and an intra-oral scanner was used to take the impression of the implant area the day of the surgery (T0, baseline) and before the crown placement (T1, 3 months). Buccal soft tissue volume was measured at 1, 3, and 5 mm apical to the healing abutment position and a comparison between T0 and T1 was performed. Student t-test was used according to the distribution of the data (Shapiro-Wilk). Results The mean KT width at baseline was 4.54 +/- 1.31 mm at buccal side and 5.04 +/- 1.88 mm at lingual side. After 3 months, the mean KM values were 3.15 +/- 1.03 mm and 3.72 +/- 1.56 mm at the buccal and lingual aspects, respectively. The differences, 30.6% of KM reduction buccally and 26.1% of reduction lingually, were statistically significant for both sides. Conclusions Within the limitations of this investigation, it was observed that the KM width from the baseline to the 3 months follow up presented a significant dimensional change in both the buccal and lingual aspects, whereas buccal soft tissue volume showed an increase between baseline and follow up.

Automated summary

This study evaluated the changes of keratinized mucosa and soft tissue volume around non-submerged implants before prosthetic rehabilitation. It was found that the width of KM significantly changed on both buccal and lingual aspects within 3 months, while buccal soft tissue volume increased between baseline and follow up.