4.7 Article

Performance Analysis of the Kalman Filter With Mismatched Noise Covariances

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL
卷 61, 期 12, 页码 4014-4019

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TAC.2016.2535158

关键词

Filter calculated MSE; ideal MSE; Kalman filter; model mismatch; performance analysis; true MSE

资金

  1. Zhejiang Provincial Nature Science Foundation of China [LR17F030005]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61172133, 61273075, 61371064, 61333011, 61673317]
  3. National 973 project of China [2013CB329405]
  4. Aeronautical Science Foundation of China [201451T002]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Kalman filter is a powerful state estimator and has been successfully applied in many fields. To guarantee the optimality of the Kalman filter, the noise covariances need to be exactly known. However, this is not necessarily true in many practical applications. Usually, they are either completely unknown or at most partially known. In this technical note, we study performance of the Kalman filter with mismatched process and measurement noise covariances. For this purpose, three mean squared errors (MSEs) are used, namely the ideal MSE (IMSE), the filter calculated MSE (FMSE), and the true MSE (TMSE). The main contribution of this work is that the relationships between the three MSEs are disclosed from two points of views. The first view is about their ordering and the second view is about the relative closeness from the FMSE and TMSE to the IMSE. Using the first view, it is found that for the case with positive (definite) deviation from the truth, the FMSE is the worst and the IMSE is the best. And for the case with negative (definite) deviation, the TMSE is the worst and the best is the FMSE. Using the second view, it is found that the TMSE is relatively closer to the IMSE than the FMSE if the deviation is larger than certain threshold, and the TMSE will be farther away otherwise. Numerical examples further verify these conclusions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据