4.3 Article

Monitoring free flaps and replanted digits via perfusion index - A proof of concept study

期刊

CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION
卷 80, 期 4, 页码 363-371

出版社

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/CH-211295

关键词

Perfusion index; monitoring; free flap; replanted digits

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the feasibility of using the perfusion index (PI) as a monitoring tool for free flaps and replanted digits. The results showed a significant intra- and interindividual range of PI and pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2). Trends in intraindividual PI changes may be a promising monitoring tool for free flaps and replanted digits.
BACKGROUND: Early detection and treatment of vascular complications in replanted digits is essential for the survival. The perfusion index (PI) represents a marker of peripheral perfusion as it shows the ratio of pulsatile to non-pulsatile blood flow. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and applicability of the PI as a monitoring tool for free flaps and replanted digits by measuring the inter- and intraindividual changes in PI. METHODS: Five patients were postoperatively monitored according to intern standards by hourly clinical evaluation. Additionally, a pulse oximeter with SET-technology (R) (Masimo Radial 7, Masimo Corporation, Irvine, USA) was added with a LNCS (R) Red TFA-1 SpO2 sensor (Masimo Corporation, Irvine, USA) and respectively a LNCS (R) Neo-3 neonatal finger clip to evaluate the perfusion via PI and SpO2. RESULTS: All patients showed sufficient perfusion in clinical controls. There was no detectable vascular complication during follow-up. Mean perfusion index was 0.93 with a median of 0.44. The patients showed a mean SpO2 of 90.59% with a median of 89.21%. CONCLUSION: Our results show a great intra- and interindividual range of PI and SpO2. SpO2 provided an even greater range than PI. Trends in intraindividual PI changes may be a promising monitoring tool for free flaps and replanted digits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据